May 2009 I was in Ann Arbor visiting my parents. It was still the depths of the recession and very rough times in the auto industry, but it was a sunny, pleasant Saturday, and a lot of car enthusiasts were out in full force. The most notable of them all was stopping by Stadium Hardware.
The driver of this car was happy to have his picture taken, but I didn't catch his name. He's a regular in the Ann Arbor area. He claimed that another reason for the Isetta to be made by BMW had to do with Messerschmitt and its post-WW II industrial capacity that needed to be turned to peaceful purpose. After World War II, the company was not allowed to produce aircraft..
My Dad is vintage 1927, this car, 1957. Both had close ties to WW II.
Word of the return of the Isetta came out in 2008, but I haven't heard or seen much of that news, since. Could be electric, could be something else.
Word of the return of the Isetta came out in 2008, but I haven't heard or seen much of that news, since. Could be electric, could be something else.
Mind you, the Isetta was not universally beloved - a
recent "worst ten" list from a downriver newspaper
(Southgate, south of Detroit) counted the Isetta as the third worst car, ever.
Worse than the Yugo. The article quotes Edmunds.com as writing that "The whole car was a crumple zone."
A bigger hurdle for the Isetta with a BMW nameplate may be the success of its cousin, the Mini. Compared to the Daimler "Smart" microcar introduced in 1998, the larger (but still small) Mini has taken off. Bloomberg Businessweek took a recent look at the sector in February 2012.
Bigger than sales are the results:
Bloomberg Businessweek |
BMW’s Mini outsells Smart about three to one. The brand now earns about €200 million a year vs. annual losses at Smart of about €100 million.It is easier to imagine BMW staying "mini," and letting the "micro" sector pass. I'm not so sure we'll see any more Isettas beyond the ones out there. Glad I saw my first with my Dad.
No comments:
Post a Comment